Compare NAKED Middleweights of: SUZUKI GSX-S750 VS YAMAHA FZ-09
Check naked middleweight coin sides.
"Naked middleweight" There is a nice ring to it, does not it? Of course, more than "naked heavyweight", but "naked lightweight" sounds intriguing. And what these two unfaired hot-headed, if not intriguing. Because when they fill the same slot in each respective manufacturer's lineup, in some respects, they are quite different.
Let's start with you do not know a: -2015 new for Suzuki GSX-S750. Think of it as a streamlined GSX-R750, although an active by readjusting the 2005 vintage engine. In this regard there is a REPLI racer than its ancestor far less plastic, but smooth, looking black frame and rocker arms are steel, not aluminum. Similarly, inverted fork and single shock at the trick, but there is much less adjustment than their counterparts in special style: the spring preload is it.
Then the bike, you do not know: Yamaha FZ-09. Launched last year, it is a design all over again, to borrow neither the motor nor the chassis from any other mode. Unlike Suzuki, Yamaha's frame and arm are aluminum, its fork and shock rebound damping is adjusted, in addition to the spring preload.
Squint and GSX-S resembles what so many monsters B- King, especially in our test car's metal matt black. Suzuki makes slightly less exercise bike out of its GSX-R has a long history, and in many ways a continuation of the GSX-S, one of the bandits and samurai swords line left off. This will be a exaggeration to call the 750 bin particularly, but many components are familiar.
Yamaha's horn shape can be said than Suzuki, we testbike brilliant cadmium yellow paint to highlight more modern. In addition, many parts of the FZ-09 than you would expect budget-priced naked bike What better. Our only criticism is its shape like instrument panels and taillights rise, the idea of afterthought. We can live in unusual sliding Start button, but who also know that it is positioned at the other side of the turn signal switch horn button should be convicted spend forever looking for it's traffic!
Suzuki lost a leg in a riding position and is immediately clear. Chicken -splittin 'fuel tank and tightly coupled seat and footpegs are purely GSX-R- problem. Fortunately, chrome, steel handlebar pipe is higher than the GSX-R of the clip assembly, but they are fairly narrow, strangely inclined and cheap looking.
Yamaha is more like sitting in an SUV than streetbike, its silver anodized aluminum tapered handlebar rights may come off the YZ450F's. Tank ultra-narrow, there are a lot of legroom, and the vast majority, flat seat, although filled with thin, very comfortable. The only lacking is the wind any illusion. Suzuki headlight fairing is small, but in fact a considerable amount of wind deflection off your torso.
Yamaha is all about power: it traces the track is quite similar Suzuki's, just line up the scale slip a bit. In terms of peak output, FZ-09, making five small horses and five pounds - feet of torque, but it has up to more than 15 pounds - feet of torque below 5000 rpm. That, friends, is the instant-on, some of the herky, jerk the point, especially in the most positive of three engine power mode. Ride-by-wire throttle response is poor from the first year of FZ-09S, but it's obviously better, this year.
This means that low-end grunt Yamaha wheelies wishes, in fact, it feels more like an open-grader is not an order of magnitude. In contrast, the Suzuki feels more like a 600, we need to enrich the clutch slip speed and get it.
Suzuki's credit, it makes predictable, linear power, its gearbox is super smooth shift. Although none of these machines that we'll call dead smooth, they will not be damaged in any debilitating shock. Suzuki tingling; Yamaha crowded.
Whether the bicycle suspension action needs to be improved. Yamaha is undersprung and underdamped, any urgent fork bottoming current brake is pressed. Suzuki is the exact opposite: it's way too damp, resulting buckboard ride. Speaking of brakes, Suzuki staff lack the initial bite compared to Yamaha's four-piston work double piston, single action calipers. Whether the bicycle is currently on the market have ABS, but may soon change makes it all streetbikes EU requirements at the beginning of next year.
In a quick look at the specifications, Yamaha has a displacement of 100cc Suzuki more than 40 pounds heavier minus credit of three-cylinder engine and aluminum chassis. The FZ-09 also provides that in the quarter-mile time and top gear roll assembly. Fuel mileage is a virtual tie, because it is the price: Yamaha Suzuki cost ratio than the blue black / white version $ 200, but only $ 50. Among them, the Suzuki in the top of the world the only one is the maximum speed: 140 and 130 mph, electronically limited means Yamaha is limited.
And this, in a nutshell, is how relatively go: It really is no contest. Unless you are on your way to or from the GSX-R Suzuki diehard fan, you'll get more satisfaction of ownership Yamaha. Than the GSX-S750 not only provides the FZ-09 higher performance, but it's stronger, more comfortable, and a whole lot more fun. Simply put, no other today streetbike provide more cost-effective as possible.
| SPECIFICATIONS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Suzuki GSX-S750 | Yamaha FZ-09 | |
| PRICE | $7999 | $8190 |
| DRY WEIGHT | 439 lb. | 396 lb. |
| WHEELBASE | 57.0 in. | 56.7 in. |
| SEAT HEIGHT | 32.4 in. | 32.2 in. |
| FUEL MILEAGE | 45 mpg | 45 mpg |
| 1/4 MILE | 11.01 sec. @ 119.75 mph | 10.66 sec. @ 125.37 mph |
| 0-60 MPH | 3.0 sec. | 2.8 sec. |
| TOP GEAR, 40-60 MPH | 3.7 sec. | 3.0 sec. |
| TOP GEAR, 60-80 MPH | 3.7 sec. | 3.5 sec. |
| TOP SPEED | 140 mph | 130 mph |
| HORSEPOWER | 99.1 hp @ 10,170 rpm | 104.9 hp @ 9920 rpm |
| TORQUE | 54.3 lb.-ft. @ 9060 rpm | 59.8 lb.-ft. @ 8420 rpm |
| BRAKING, 30-0 MPH | 32 ft. | 32 ft. |
| BRAKING, 60-0 MPH | 136 ft. | 132 ft. |
